<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But Didn&#8217;t We Have Fun? An Informal History of Baseball&#8217;s Pioneer Era, 1843-1870 &#8212; by Peter Morris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseballbookreview.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseballbookreview.com/?p=110</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Lagreid</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballbookreview.com/?p=110&#038;cpage=1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Lagreid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baseballbookreview.wordpress.com/?p=110#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the times are changing -- but it doesn&#039;t mean that baseball had to accept instant replay.

Why doesn&#039;t MLB use aluminum bats? That was a technological innovation that, in theory, is a development of the game.

Why do we not want players to use steroids? That&#039;s an innovation that, in theory, contributes to the advancement of the game. (I don&#039;t believe in steroids, I&#039;m just making an example.)

Why don&#039;t we juice the balls up even further? That could easily be done as an inevitable development.

I just wonder how we ever made it without computers - how did Babe Ruth, Joe DiMaggio, Christy Mathewson, Walter Johnson, Josh Gibson, and all the other pre-computer age players and fans make it?

To me, we have gotten too wrapped up in trying to make the imperfect be perfect. Just because we have the technology, doesn&#039;t necessarily mean we have to use it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the times are changing &#8212; but it doesn&#8217;t mean that baseball had to accept instant replay.</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t MLB use aluminum bats? That was a technological innovation that, in theory, is a development of the game.</p>
<p>Why do we not want players to use steroids? That&#8217;s an innovation that, in theory, contributes to the advancement of the game. (I don&#8217;t believe in steroids, I&#8217;m just making an example.)</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t we juice the balls up even further? That could easily be done as an inevitable development.</p>
<p>I just wonder how we ever made it without computers &#8211; how did Babe Ruth, Joe DiMaggio, Christy Mathewson, Walter Johnson, Josh Gibson, and all the other pre-computer age players and fans make it?</p>
<p>To me, we have gotten too wrapped up in trying to make the imperfect be perfect. Just because we have the technology, doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean we have to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy Badger</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballbookreview.com/?p=110&#038;cpage=1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willy Badger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baseballbookreview.wordpress.com/?p=110#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great review!  The times are a changing. Video replay was inevitable. However much history baseball has there is a modern psyche that says everything must be right because the computer said so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review!  The times are a changing. Video replay was inevitable. However much history baseball has there is a modern psyche that says everything must be right because the computer said so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
