Eye for Talent: Interviews with Veteran Baseball Scouts – edited by P.J. Dragseth

While scouts have not been part of all of baseball’s long history, they have been part of it for well over 100 years. They travel the country and the world, looking for young players who show the promise of turning into a big leaguer. They rack up tens of thousands of miles, watch more games in a year than some people will watch in their lifetimes, and have to make informed decisions on the prospects of a young man often with only a few exposures to him on the field.

And while the idea of being a scout probably sounds idyllic to many fans, each of the 19 men profiled in Eye for Talent are quick to testify that the reality isn’t as great as the romance.

P.J. Dragseth, who produced Go Pro Baseball Wise in 1999, edits together interviews with 19 scouts who together have amassed centuries of professional experience both playing and scouting baseball at the amateur and professional levels.

When this title first crossed my radar, my interest was instantly peaked, thinking that Dragseth might have compiled a fresh look at baseball through the eyes of scouts, those individuals charged with finding the players that will amaze, entertain and inspire future generations with their talents and hopefully bring a World Series championship to our favorite team.

Having been around baseball for a few years myself, I was hoping that this book would be one I could recommend to fans looking to become smarter about how they watch baseball: what to look for, what traits young players exhibit that indicate potential for greatness down the road and so forth. I wanted gold, because scouts have so much information between their ears that having someone tackle the task of compiling it and writing it down excited me tremendously.

However, none of that emerged and after 234 pages, I was left incredibly disappointed.

What Dragseth does is give these scouts an open platform on which to ramble about their backgrounds, accomplishments and funny stories while not holding them accountible for sharing things with the reader that turns them into a better and smarter fan. There is no argument presented in the book by Dragseth, although there are a few things all these veteran scouts repeated throughout the book that they agreed on:

  • They are horribly underappreciated and generally horribly underpaid.
  • Things (meaning baseball business, free agency, statistics, computers and so on) aren’t like they used to be.
  • The institution of the draft in 1965 forever changed the game of baseball and the way that they did their job.
  • Almost every fan doesn’t know what a scout really does and thinks that scouting must be the greatest job in the world, when in fact it’s nothing close to that.
  • A lot of folks currently working in baseball don’t know as much about baseball as they do.

Eye for Talent shares a commonality with the men profiled in the book: just like scouts often have to sort through hundreds of players to find one who will make the Major Leagues, you will have to sort through hundreds of words, stories and ramblings in order to find useful information. Even then, I can’t recall anything I read that I will take with me to the ballpark next time I go and feel smarter for knowing it.

If anything, Eye for Talent just adds a bunch of names, places and stories to baseball history, which may come in handy for some researcher down the line, but not for the average baseball fan.

I suspect many readers would go into this book looking for insights from scouts who have spend decades honing their craft, unfortunatley that expectation never manifests in any form.

While I have no doubt that Mr. Dragseth did a good amount of work putting this book together, to say that it was edited would be a generous term. Editing, at least as it was taught to me, involves cutting and cropping to put together a finely tuned finished product. If the term editing is truly appropriate for this work, something that only Mr. Dragseth and his publisher likely know, than I can’t imagine what these “interviews” must have come out looking like in their original form. Rather, what you are given is a stream-of-consciousness that could be interesting while sharing a beer at a ballgame or over dinner, it falls flat in the context of this book. As opposed to interviews, it seems Dragseth just started the recorder and let it run as opposed to asking questions and guiding his subjects to provide answers to topics. One scout profiled simply wrote a letter back to Dragseth, which he published seemingly whole in the book. To think that he had the opportunity to question these men and get them to open up is an enviable thought, as few people would ever get that level of access to these kinds of figures within baseball. There seems to be a gap far and wide between what I consider and hope to generate from an interview and what Mr. Dragseth does, as evidenced by his seemingly hands-off approach to the topic.

Like a scout who believes in a player only to see him stumble after signing him and never make anything out of himself in the game, I felt let down by what could have been a remarkable book based on the individuals whom Dragseth solicited for their thoughts. Yet because Eye for Talent is focused on individuals instead of themes and key points, the knowledge and insight never shines through.

Unfortunately, other than the above points that get rehashed by almost every one of the 19 scouts, there is neither an argument laid out nor any kind of compelling information that warrants a recommendation to read this title. With a $39.95 list price, it makes it a borrow recommendation if you absolutely have to read it, because there is no way I could justify that price for what I got out of it.

If you don’t mind sifting through a lot of stories to find the occasional nugget, or you like to sit around and listen to old men tell stories, you’ll likely enjoy Eye for Talent. If not, I suggest you wait for a title to come out that tackles this subject in a more compelling way, as Bruce Weber did in As They See ‘Em, his seminal work about the life of umpires and their role in America’s pastime. Hopefully the publishers of the world will be able to keep their eyes open for an individual to providen this much needed look at the world of scouting and deliver it in a more usable format.

3 comments to Eye for Talent: Interviews with Veteran Baseball Scouts – edited by P.J. Dragseth

  • Great article! Your style is so refreshing compared to most other bloggers. Thanks for posting when you do, I will be sure to read more!

  • Dear Nameless:

    Re: Eye for Talent.

    First of all, I’m happy you had enough interest in scouts and their tremendous contributions to the game to read Eye for Talent. That’s one mission accomplished for me on their behalf. Sadly, however, you missed the entire point of the book.

    Please allow me to explain it to you.It was done at the request of one veteran scout, Dick Wilson, with other veteran scouts who remained faithful to their profession for decades, sometimes because of changes, but mostly in spite of them. My time spent with them consisted of several recorded interviews, conversations, and letters about their backgrounds and experiences in baseball, their knowledge and love of the game, and why they became scouts. It was a way to introduce fans to the invisible men who prefer to remain anonymous as they find, identify, project future development, and bring the steady flow of players to the game.

    It was NEVER INTENDED as a book teaching readers how to scout. That would be impossible! Scouting is an innate skill that requires knowledge of multiple facets of the game and human characteristics that cannot be taught, only sharpened by guidance of other scouts with the same ability. It takes years on and around baseball diamonds to become a successful scout and anyone who thinks it can be learned by reading a book or two simply doesn’t get it. If this offends, I’m sorry; but sometimes the truth does that.

    Second, you missed a point that as these gentlemen told their stories they revealed much about baseball history, heroes of the past, and life in leagues that no longer exist as they experienced them first hand. In some cases they provide information and fill in holes where official records are sketchy at best.

    Third, perhaps if you reread the material you will find that many of the “stories” to which you refer concern how they found and fought for various players for their organizations, such as the Craig Counsell story, or Garry Templeton, or Nolan Ryan, or Jack Clark, and many others.

    Fourth, if you do interviews perhaps you prefer to interject yourself into your work. My style is different. The book is about SCOUTS….not about me. Any thinking reader would certainly understand that and immediately glean it from the text.

    Fifth, you mention a failure to focus/discuss key points. Amazing. I’m also disappointed that you did not recognize the significance of their comments about the impact of the Draft, corporate ownership as opposed to the family owned clubs of the past, the rise/power/influence of agents, the million dollar plus contracts for unproved high school amateurs, and other salient issues as key points. Perhaps those things didn’t seem like key points to you, but then, you’re not a scout.

    Sixth, I’m gld that when you mentiond their universal concern about low pay, meager pensions, and lack of recognition you were not insinuating they were whinig. Scouts don’t whine, they endure and persevere as they sign players who make millions of dollars while they wonder if they’ll get an adequate pension.
    Fortunately that’s one point that is improving. For the record, they do not get any kind of commission or other compensation for those players signed, merely personal satisfaction as they succeed.

    Thanks for the opportunity t set the record straight.
    Oh yes, speaking of nuggets, every one of the scouts in this book is a nugget in and of himself as a part of the history of his profession as well as the game. Oops….seems you missed that, too.

    Finally, everyone has complaints about his job, but whatever you do, don’t make the mistake of thinking scouts don’t think they have the greatest job in the world. To a man they’ll tell you they do!

    Here’s one for you. Do you know how many scouts are in the Hall of Fame at Cooperstown?

  • I’m curious to find out what blog system you’re working with?
    I’m having some minor security issues with my latest blog and I would like to find something more risk-free. Do you have any suggestions?